Manchester Community Council                          www.manchesterwa.org

PO Box 173                                                                         

Manchester, WA  98353-0173

“it’s a great place to live…”

 

Draft Minutes for MCC meeting of 9/26/06

Action Items:

1) John Winslow to prepare a document for Ron Robinson to submit to the County reinforcing the intent of the Plan verbiage on two-story mixed use in the commercial zone.

 

Minutes:

The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair, Ron Rada at 6:33PM in the Manchester Library.  Ron welcomed the 25 people (including 17 current members, a quorum) in attendance and then introduced our special speaker for the evening, Bill Palmer.  Bill is the developer on the Colchester Commons project and he asked to present his latest changes to the proposed project.

Guest Speakers comments:

Bill opened his remarks reinforcing that he is the planner on the project.  Several changes have been made to the design, which are important.  These changes include; the second level deck has been extended 4.5’ for the planting areas on the west side, and the ground level planters are now 12’ wide and extend across most of the west side of the project.  Plantings on the west side of the grounds will include a few small trees planted in the right-of-way along with perennials and annuals on the north side.  Due to concerns about the amount of retail space originally included, this has been reduced from 7700 ft² to about 5000 ft² which will allow the addition of an open plaza on the main floor.  Bill did comment that if there is a great demand for retail space, he may consider working with the County for approval to convert this back to retail use.  This plaza is planned to be used as a common area; while not officially a meeting area (due to parking regulations), this might be a use that could develop.  The area will likely be open during normal business hours.  Another feature included in this development to make the site as desirable as possible is the “undergrounding” of overhead power lines which currently impact the view of some adjacent neighbors.  The Anchors at Manchester project is also including the underground wires as part of that project.

Bill mentioned that he has another hearing scheduled with the County on Thursday September 28th at 1:30PM which is open to the public.

Palmer then took questions from the attendees.

?: What is the planned use for the open space on the ground floor?

A: This will be a common gathering space which is a “holding space” for possible future use as by retail if there is demand, and if the County would approve such a conditional use permit.

?: Is there another project still under consideration at the site just north of Spruce on Colchester?

A: Yes, this is still in the planning stage.  It will have a similar look, but slightly different.

?: Is the vegetation intended as a sound barrier?

A: We’re trying to be sensitive to our residential neighbors.  We could build a fence if those neighbors would request that.

?: What do you mean by calling the space on the main floor a “holding area”?

A: We may want to convert this space back to retail use if there is demand for that.

?: Could this open center space be used by the condo residents?

A: Yes.

?: Why are you adding this plaza?

A: We’re trying to follow the goals of the Manchester Plan.

?: Are we going to be overwhelmed with commercial space?

A: This is a function of the size of the Manchester commercial zone and how it is developed, provided you can meet the parking requirements.

?: What is the planned garage size?

A: It will run from the west property line to within 10’ of the east property line, and will be 207’ long from north to south.  The building will set-back 5’ from the north and south property lines, but will overhang on the upper floors to just inside of the property lines.

            That wrapped-up the questions and Vice Chair Rada thanked Bill Palmer for his remarks.

 

Community Group announcements:

Manchester Community Association: Carrilu Thompson reported that the Manchester Festival was considered a success, as measured by the vendor’s willingness to participate in the future.  The only noted problem was parking; they’ll work on a solution for next year!  The next activity of the MCA (this is a joint effort with the MCC as well!) will be a roadside trash pick-up on Saturday October 7th from 9AM – Noon.  Volunteers are needed and will gather in the Library parking lot, but be careful to leave plenty of parking spaces for Library patrons!!

The next meeting of the MCA will be on 10/4 at 7:00PM in the Library.

 

Manchester Historical Society: Ron Rada said that the next meeting of the Society will be on Tuesday 10/24 at 4:00PM in the Library.

 

Manchester Foundation: Ron Rada mentioned that the IRS is still processing the paperwork on the 501c3 application.  It was suggested that all groups within the Foundation use the same accounting methods to simplify reporting.

 

Crime Prevention and Public Safety Group: Ron also reported for the Safety Group.  At a recent meeting, the guests were John Brand and Jeff Shea of the Kitsap Co. Traffic Department.  They reported the outcome of the survey of traffic action recently conducted at the request of the Safety Group.  The results included Port of Manchester parking lot Weekday-319 vehicles, Weekends 622/652/622 vehicles.  Beach Drive ADT (average daily traffic) 1,467-40MPH (85th percentile average speeds), Colchester two locations ADT 2,068-36MPH/2,182-43MPH.  Main Street ADT 2,202-30MPH/2,276-39MPH, all in 25MPH zones. It was noted there are violations on speed in all areas; use of lighted speed rates can be helpful.  This is something that the Sheriff's department does not have the time or staff to dedicate full time to observation and violations.

The County staff did indicate an eagerness to work with the Safety Group and the MCC on traffic issues related to the planned review of the Manchester Plan.

 

Business meeting:

Vice Chair Rada then opened the business meeting with a review of the MCC mission statement.

 

Review and approval of past meeting’s minutes:

The minutes of the 8/22 meeting were approved as written.

 

Correspondence:

            There was no significant mail received this past month.

 

Reports:

Treasurer:

            Debby Trudeau reported that the treasury balance is now $717.05.  Monthly activity included payment of $31.71 to Arlene Rebelowski for copying costs associated with MCC brochures for the Kitsap Greeters distribution and $28 for the annual PO Box fee.  Member Joe McGuire recently completed an audit of the MCC books and found the books to be in order, but made several suggestions for improvement in our approach, which the Executive Board is implementing.  Debby has a copy of the audit and it is available for inspection.  Special thanks to Joe McGuire (he has an accounting business in town!) for conducting the audit at no cost to the MCC!!!!

 

Sewers Sub-Committee:

            Ron Rada gave an update on sewer activity.  The LID#8 has a requirement for project completion within 120 days, so Colchester shouldn’t be torn up much longer!  The petition for formation of LID#9 now has 36% of the required signatures.  There will be further follow-up with those who have yet to be contacted and completion of the petition process is targeted for mid-October.

 

MCC Action Groups:

-Downtown Design:  C. Thompson and C. Leininger said that they have collected 46 survey inputs from Manchester residents.  Data are currently being collated.  It was pointed out that we currently do not have downtown design standards, as suggested in the Manchester Plan.  We have height standards, but we still need to work with developers on design approach.  The County has apparently applied the Kingston Design Standards to the Manchester area, but their classification as an urban village is different from Manchester’s rural village.

 

-Historic Village Character: Mike Valentino said he had discussed the proposed revisions to the Lot Aggregation language that was approved by the MCC recently.  Eric had reviewed the proposal and suggested a few wording changes that would eliminate loopholes.  The proposed language is as follows: “Nonconforming Lots in Common Ownership Contiguous lots of record held in common ownership, each lot legally created before adoption of the Manchester Community Plan, must be combined to meet the minimum lot requirements of its zone if one or more of the lots is less than 8,712 square feet in size or does not meet the dimensional requirement of its zone and at the time of adoption of the Manchester Community Plan (March 18, 2002), either 1) a residential structure encumbered more than one of the contiguous lots or 2) two or more of the contiguous lots were vacant.  If one or more of the Lots is sold or otherwise removed from common ownership after the adoption of the Manchester Community Plan, it will not be considered to meet the minimum lot requirement for non-conforming lots in single ownership.  Property with two contiguous lots legally created before adoption of the Manchester Community Plan with a residential structure entirely on one lot may develop the second lot consistent with applicable zoning.”

            This led to an extended discussion on lot aggregation.  Member Stritzel suggested that the County Attorney should issue a written opinion on building on small lots prior to any vote by the membership to accept the new verbiage.  It was pointed out however, that the prior verbiage was on the docket for approval, so if we didn’t approve this verbiage, then the flawed verbiage might be accepted by the County.  Debbie Trudeau offered her opinion that she did not believe that this subject was going before the Commissioners for a vote.

Finally, a vote by hand was taken and there were 8 yes, 2 no, and Mike Valentino submitted eight additional “yes” absentee votes from members.

 

-Partnerships with other Agencies: No report.

 

-Village Commons: John Winslow reported that Bill Shaw was on the Friends of the Library meeting agenda (for 9/28) to discuss the possibility of a joint meeting between the Friends and the Village Commons group to discuss the planning effort.  (Note that Bill Shaw did not attend the subsequent FOML meeting).

 

Old Business:

            Ron Rada reminded all members that if they are corresponding on public matters, members may not speak on behalf of the MCC, but only as public citizens.  Official correspondence on behalf of the MCC is handled by the Chairman and Secretary with the concurrence of the Executive Board.

 

New Business:

            Volunteers were solicited for a nominating committee to recommend MCC officers to be elected at the November meeting.  It is hoped that Chairman Ron Robinson will coordinate this effort, and Arlene Rebelowski also volunteered to help.  At least one other member volunteer is required.

            Ron Rada suggested that the County is missing the intent of the verbiage in the Manchester Plan which states: “To encourage two-story mixed use development, the height restriction on commercial or mixed use properties within this zone will be set at 35 feet, measured from the average grade at the foundation to the structures highest point.”  It was agreed that John Winslow would prepare a letter to the County to reinforce the intent of the Plan.

There being no other discussion from the floor, Vice Chairman Rada adjourned the meeting at 8:05 PM.

Our next meeting will be Tuesday October 24th 6:30-8:30PM in the Manchester Library. 

Ron Robinson and John Winslow will jointly develop an agenda for our next meeting for distribution with the reminder, several days before the meeting.  At this point the tentative agenda includes…….  If you have any additional items for the agenda, contact John Winslow prior to October 13th.

 

Respectfully submitted,

John Winslow, Secretary-Manchester Community Council