Manchester Community Council                           www.manchesterwa.org

PO Box 173                                                                         

Manchester, WA  98353-0173

“it’s a great place to live…”

 

Draft Minutes for MCC meeting of 3/27/07

Action Items:

1) Executive Board to bring recommendation on Citizen of the Year to the 4/24 meeting.

 

Minutes:

The meeting was called to order by Chair, Ron Rada at 6:30PM in the Manchester Library.  Ron welcomed the 20 people (including 18 current members) in attendance.  There was no guest speaker for this meeting.

 

Foundation Program announcements:

Manchester Community Association: Debby Trudeau reported that the MCA will be hosting the following events: the annual Bunny Hop on April 7, Roadside clean-up on May 19, and the Street Festival will likely be on a Saturday in late July this year.

Manchester Historical Society: Ron Rada suggested anyone interested in participating in the Historical Society’s activities should see the section on our web-site (at MCC web-site noted above).

Manchester Foundation: Ron Rada reported that after 8 months, the IRS has given us the okay on formation of the Foundation.  One caveat is that we are to refer to each of the former “community groups” as programs within the Foundation for one 501c3 to apply to all.  There will be a meeting of the trustees of the Foundation on April 19.

Crime Prevention and Public Safety Group: Bud Larsen reports that the extension of the boat launching ramp will have a bid opening on 4/26 with work to be conducted 8/14 thru 10/31.  He also said that the new Port Resolutions are now in the hands of the County Commissioners for ratification.  Implementation details will be discussed at the next Port of Manchester meeting on Monday April 9 at 7PM.  Finally, Bud has written the appropriate letters to initiate the addition of an additional driveway to the Post Office so that there might be a drive-thru mail drop-off.

 

Business meeting:

Ron Rada then began the formal meeting with a review of the MCC Mission Statement and asked for a review and approval of past meeting’s minutes:  The minutes of the 1/23 meeting were approved as written.

 

Correspondence: No significant correspondence.

 

Reports:

Treasurer: Debby Trudeau reported our bank balance is currently $1024.48.  She has been further investigating accounting software and specifically looking for software appropriate for 501c3 non-profits similar to the Foundation.  Debby mentioned that the National Council of Non-Profits Association has an excellent web-site (www.ncna.org) that could be a very valuable resource.

 

Sewers Sub-Committee: Ron Rada reported that the final re-paving for LID#8 was being completed today and the final billings should be submitted shortly.  Once that is completed, the effort for moving LID#9 forward can be re-instituted, and should occur within two months.

 

 

MCC Action Groups:

-Downtown Design: Efforts will be reported later in these minutes.

-Historic Village Character: No report.

-Partnerships with other Agencies: Efforts focused on developing Plan revisions.

-Village Commons: No report, but Ron Rada suggested that this project should move to the forefront of our activities for the remainder of the year.  A coordinated effort between the MCC, Friends of the Library, and Port of Manchester will be required.

 

Old Business:

            Ron Rada said that the Executive Board had discussed several candidates for recognition as “MCC Citizen of the Year”, but there are additional candidates for consideration.  A recommendation will be brought to the next MCC meeting by the Executive Board.

            Matti Walters is still coming up to speed on querying the County web-site for new construction approvals.  It was reported that there have been no significant approvals for the Manchester area issued by the County recently. 

The Colchester Commons project was mentioned and it is reported to be in default.  Those knowledgeable with the situation reported that the project is likely to continue ahead with new financing and no design change other than meeting the 28 provisions required by the County.

 

New Business:

            Carrilu Thompson reported on activities by the Downtown Design Committee of the MCC which is assembling a clarification of the verbiage used in the original Plan.  The group has been meeting bi-weekly recently.  Carrilu said this effort is underway due to the intent of the original Manchester Plan not being translated into code by the County.  The group will focus just on the downtown commercial core area, while the new group working under the County auspices on the Plan revisions will consider all zoning topics.  This Downtown Design committee is eager to get the Plan language clarified before more development permits are submitted.  Carrilu said that the County staff has verified that this group’s approach is viable.

            The group has three points for clarification in the existing Plan;

1)      The height of buildings in the commercial district and the number of stories allowed.

2)      The ratio of residential space to commercial space in the mixed development.

3)      Parking spaces required for the commercial core in light of the existing lack of parking.

The group will be working on language to clarify the intent, without changing the intent of the original Plan and they will seek community input on the proposed verbiage.  Carrilu also reports that the Planning Commission is seeking input from the community on these issues.  Carrilu then read the points on which she is basing her input to the Planning Commission:

  1. The Manchester Plan was completed 7 years ago by a diverse cross section of the citizens of Manchester. It was written in good faith and with the assumption that the document, having been written, reviewed, rewritten and accepted by this group, would direct the community of Manchester into the future.  We completed the plan with “reasonable expectations” that the language in the plan would be binding and not open for interpretation because the DCD had reviewed the document and published it, as originally presented, in total.

 

2.  The LAMIRD supports the original population density of “Rural Village  

     addressed in the Manchester plan. The current decisions supporting    

the two 3 story projects passed by the hearing examiner advocate, by allowing three story mixed use buildings, for a higher population density than originally allows for in the LAMIRD.  The intension of having two story buildings, as written in the plan, does support the “Rural Village” population density and the small town character of Manchester.  The plan supports the snap shot taken of the community in 1990, the original date the LAMIRD was drawn up.  We want the language “two story mixed development” included in the code, as originally intended by the language in the plan.

 

  1. Redevelopment of the commercial zone of Manchester is inevitable.  It is        how the zone is redeveloped that is so vitally important because of the finite area involved, the close proximity to Puget Sound and its salmon run, the extremely limited ingress and egress into the commercial zone, the critical shortage of public parking for business and recreational uses and the possible residential view blockage by the commercial buildings.   We believed that the original plan would be used to address these critical issues. If the words in the Manchester plan are not used to support the original intent of its authors, then it is even more critical to adopt more specific design standards before any additional permits are issued.

Carrilu suggested members of the community contact the following members of the Planning Commission with their input:

Chair: John Taylor (Central)
North
Lou Foritano
Linda Paralez, paralez@demarcheconsulting.com
Thomas E. Nevins, tenevins@earthlink.net


Central
Dean Jenniges, jenniges3@comcast.net


South
Lary Coppola, biznews@wetapple.com
Michael A. Gustavson, mgustavson@aol.com
Fred Depee, freddepee@wavecable.com

John Taylor does not have email and emails to Lou Foritano can be sent
through Carrilu for forwarding to him.

The Downtown Design group will be the focus of our meeting next month, so if you want to hear more details, please plan to attend on April 24th.

Ron Rada mentioned that none of the existing five groups reviewing the Plan seem to have the issue of formation of a Community Advisor Board which is acknowledged by the County Commissioners (the original objective of the MCC) under their purview.  Ron asked for members of the community to provide input on that topic.

Bud Larsen then gave a quick overview of the activities of the Plan Review Transportation committee.  His point was that their primary efforts to date, have involved educating the County representatives on the details of the Manchester community, boundaries, problem areas, parking issues, etc.

We asked for input from the Natural Systems group, but apparently they have not met due to higher priority on other group’s efforts.

The Infrastructure group has reported that not many changes are anticipated in this area, so efforts will be very limited.

The Zoning group seems to have the major attention from most members of the committee.  They have discussed sidewalks and parking in the downtown area and have spent the rest of their time focusing on height limitations and number of stories on the developments in the commercial area.  Several options have been discussed, with no clear resolution to date.  The group has not discussed lot aggregation.

Finally, the Public Facilities/Parks/Recreation group was not represented, and had no report.
            Lyle Burbidge said that he will be continuing to work toward a commercial development moratorium until the Plan verbiage clarifications are in place.

There being no other discussion from the floor, Chairman Rada adjourned the meeting at  8:07 PM.

Our next meeting will be Tuesday April 24th at 6:30-8:30PM in the Manchester Library. 

Ron Rada and John Winslow will jointly develop an agenda for our next meeting.  At this point the tentative agenda will focus on the efforts to clarify language on commercial development issues as noted above.  If you have any additional items for the agenda, contact John Winslow prior to April 14th.

 

Respectfully submitted,

John Winslow, Member-at-Large:Manchester Community Council